The FACIT-Sp spiritual wellbeing scale: a factor analysis in patients with severe and/or life-limiting medical illnesses.

BACKGROUND: The Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Spiritual Well-Being Scale (FACIT-Sp) is a widely used measure of spiritual wellbeing. However, consensus on the best factor structure for this measure has not been reached. Both a 2-factor (Meaning/Peace, Faith) and a 3-factor (Meaning, Peace, Faith) structure are reported in the literature. In this study, we examined the factorial structure of the FACIT-Sp in a population of patients with severe and/or life-limiting medical illnesses. METHODS: The present study is a part of a larger study that validated the National Institute of Health-Healing Experiences of All Life Stressors (NIH-HEALS), a measure of psycho-social-spiritual healing developed by the Pain and Palliative Care Service at the National Institutes of Health Clinical Center (NIH-CC). The sample included 200 subjects who were recruited from the NIH Clinical Center inpatient units and outpatient clinics with severe and/or life limiting illnesses (cancer, non-genetic conditions, genetic conditions, blood dyscrasias). FACIT-Sp is a 12-item questionnaire scored on a 5-point Likert scale (0 = not at all; 4 = very much). Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and principal component analysis (PCA) were used to analyze results and to identify the number of latent constructs and underlying factor structure. RESULTS: The results supported the 3-factor (Meaning, Peace, and Faith) model of the FACIT-Sp and accounted for the most variability (74.20%), followed by the 2-factor solution (64.95%). The identified factors related to Faith, Peace, and Meaning and were consistent with previously reported 3-factor model. CONCLUSIONS: This study confirmed the 3-factor structure of FACIT-Sp. This information can inform interventions aimed at improving quality of life and spiritual wellbeing in clinical and palliative care settings.

The Social Vulnerability Index and Long-term Outcomes After Traumatic Injury.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the Social Vulnerability Index (SVI) as a predictor of long-term outcomes after injury. BACKGROUND: The SVI is a measure used in emergency preparedness to identify need for resources in the event of a disaster or hazardous event, ranking each census tract on 15 demographic/social factors. METHODS: Moderate-severely injured adult patients treated at 1 of 3 level-1 trauma centers were prospectively followed 6 to 14 months post-injury. These data were matched at the census tract level with overall SVI percentile rankings. Patients were stratified based on SVI quartiles, with the lowest quartile designated as low SVI, the middle 2 quartiles as average SVI, and the highest quartile as high SVI. Multivariable adjusted regression models were used to assess whether SVI was associated with long-term outcomes after injury. RESULTS: A total of 3153 patients were included [54% male, mean age 61.6 (SD = 21.6)]. The median overall SVI percentile rank was 35th (IQR: 16th-65th). compared to low SVI patients, high SVI patients were more likely to have new functional limitations [odds ratio (OR), 1.51; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.19-1.92), to not have returned to work (OR, 2.01; 95% CI, 1.40-2.89), and to screen positive for post-traumatic stress disorder (OR, 1.56; 95% CI, 1.12-2.17). Similar results were obtained when comparing average with low SVI patients, with average SVI patients having significantly worse outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: The SVI has potential utility in predicting individuals at higher risk for adverse long-term outcomes after injury. This measure may be a useful needs assessment tool for clinicians and researchers in identifying communities that may benefit most from targeted prevention and intervention efforts.

A nature-based health intervention at a military healthcare center: a randomized, controlled, cross-over study.

We describe a mixed qualitative and quantitative research study in a military facility regarding the role of nature in well-being. Study intervention included two 20-minute walks. One walk was in an intentionally designed woodland environment (Green Road) and the other was on a busy campus road in a medical treatment facility (Urban Road). Twelve volunteers from a military facility participated in both walks in a cross-over experimental design. The two walking sessions were randomly ordered and preceded by pre-walk instructions appropriate to each road's characteristics and incorporated focused attention and present moment orientation. A semi-structured post-walk interview, the primary outcome, was conducted after the conclusion of each walk. Qualitative data analyses consisted of sentiments and themes by using NVivo 12 software. The Green Road was unanimously rated as positive (100%). Responses to Urban Road were evenly distributed among positive (33.3%), negative (33.3%), and neutral/mixed (33.3%) sentiments. The Green Road yielded predominantly positive themes such as enjoyment of nature, relaxation, and feelings of privacy and safety. Urban Road produced significantly more negative themes such as concerns for safety, dislike of noise and other noxious experiences. Quantitative assessment of distress and mindfulness with Distress Thermometer (DT) and Mindful Attention Awareness Scale-state version (MAAS) demonstrated that a walk on the Green Road significantly decreased distress and increased mindfulness compared to a walk on the Urban Road. We also observed that pre-walk instructions could direct attention to both obvious and subtle elements of experience and enhance awareness. Results support the notion that an intentional nature-based environment may produce significantly more positive experiences and result in health-promoting benefits in a military health-care setting compared to an urban environment. Future studies with clinical populations could advance our understanding of the healing value of nature-based interventions. The impact of intentional green environments may be enhanced by well-designed instructions for both recreational and therapeutic use.